Sujet : Re: Assassin's Creed Odyssey
De : gmkeros (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Kyonshi)
Groupes : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpgDate : 08. Sep 2024, 11:02:56
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Erebor InterNetNews
Message-ID : <vbjsog$tti$1@ereborbbs.duckdns.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 9/7/2024 9:35 PM, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
On 9/7/2024 9:16 AM, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
On Fri, 6 Sep 2024 11:49:17 -0500, Altered Beast <j63480576@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
>
It's probably better to err on the side of "too big." I played Zelda:
Breath of Life and found it about right. I ended up going to a website
to discover the location of two shrines I was missing in running over
the area. Breath of Life did it really well, but that is about as AAA a
game as you can find, being Zelda. You know they did some research on
the matter.
>
YMMV. I've grown increasingly tired of all these huge-for-the-sake-
of-being-huge games. Partly because I just don't want to dedicate 500
hours to exploring every nook and cranny. But also because -in order
to fill out all these aforementioned nooks and crannies- developers
are increasingly turning towards procedural generation and the result
is just boring grind. I'd much rather a smaller, better paced
adventure.
>
But that's just me. The nice thing about modern video gaming is
there's a game to suit EVERYBODY'S taste these days. ;-)
>
And some that suit nobody's taste but the one person who created it.
Well, but there were examples of that before. Anyone remember Battlecruiser 3000AD?