Re: Civ 7

Liste des GroupesRevenir à csipg strategic 
Sujet : Re: Civ 7
De : rstowleigh (at) *nospam* x-nospam-x.com (Rin Stowleigh)
Groupes : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic
Date : 15. Jun 2024, 11:38:18
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <2irq6j1mnkqfouorj84rm45d2vv51cc5k3@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Forte Agent 4.0/32.1071
On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 19:42:32 +0200, Kyonshi <gmkeros@gmail.com> wrote:

On 6/14/2024 7:02 PM, Rin Stowleigh wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 15:08:09 +0200, Kyonshi <gmkeros@gmail.com> wrote:
 
On 6/12/2024 7:21 PM, Rin Stowleigh wrote:
>
Real AI (not what most gamers have historically called AI) integrated
into dialog / behavior / relationships with other civilizations is
where the franchise should go next.  It's a mistake if that's not done
in Civ 7.  And if it's not done, it's only a matter of time before a
competitor gets there first.
>
so far there is no real AI. Just stuff they hype up as AI.
 
Look up YT vids for a game called BodyCam.  It introduces a level of
immersive visual realism to the tactical shooter genre that to my
knowledge hasn't been done before, and it supposed came to market via
a couple of kids (well a 17 year old and a 20 year old).
 
Someone will do something equally as disruptive to the strategy genre
utilizing real AI soon, and if the Civ series is caught sleeping, it
will become irrelevant overnight.
>
There still is no real AI

Years ago, I realized the juice simply was not worth the squeeze
whenever I allowed myself to get baited into pendantic black holes of
opinion-presented-as-fact-discussion.

But occasionally, it's probably good for the soul to treat myself to
an occasional token episode of frivolous time wasting activity?  ;)

So I'm curious what aspect of the current state of what is
colloquially referred to as AI fails to meet your personal definition
of "real"?

Date Sujet#  Auteur
10 Jun 24 * Civ 733Kyonshi
11 Jun 24 +* Re: Civ 72Spalls Hurgenson
11 Jun 24 i`- Re: Civ 71Kyonshi
12 Jun 24 `* Re: Civ 730Rin Stowleigh
13 Jun 24  `* Re: Civ 729Kyonshi
14 Jun 24   `* Re: Civ 728Rin Stowleigh
14 Jun 24    `* Re: Civ 727Kyonshi
15 Jun 24     `* Re: Civ 726Rin Stowleigh
15 Jun 24      `* Re: Civ 725<smaug
15 Jun 24       `* Re: Civ 724Rin Stowleigh
15 Jun 24        `* Re: Civ 723<smaug
16 Jun 24         `* Re: Civ 722Rin Stowleigh
16 Jun 24          `* Re: Civ 721Kyonshi
16 Jun 24           `* Re: Civ 720Rin Stowleigh
16 Jun 24            `* Re: Civ 719Kyonshi
16 Jun 24             `* Re: Civ 718Rin Stowleigh
17 Jun 24              `* Re: Civ 717Kyonshi
17 Jun 24               `* Re: Civ 716Rin Stowleigh
18 Jun 24                `* Re: Civ 715Kyonshi
18 Jun 24                 `* Re: Civ 714Rin Stowleigh
18 Jun 24                  `* Re: Civ 713<smaug
19 Jun 24                   `* Re: Civ 712Rin Stowleigh
19 Jun 24                    `* Re: Civ 711Kyonshi
19 Jun 24                     `* Re: Civ 710Rin Stowleigh
19 Jun 24                      `* Re: Civ 79Kyonshi
20 Jun 24                       `* Re: Civ 78Rin Stowleigh
20 Jun 24                        `* Re: Civ 77Kyonshi
16 Jul 24                         `* Re: Civ 76Samuel Söderberg
17 Jul 24                          `* Re: Civ 75Spalls Hurgenson
9 Aug 24                           `* Re: Civ 74Zaghadka
9 Aug 24                            +- Re: Civ 71Spalls Hurgenson
23 Aug 24                            `* Re: Civ 72Kyonshi
24 Aug 24                             `- Re: Civ 71Spalls Hurgenson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal