Re: Civ 7

Liste des GroupesRevenir à csipg strategic 
Sujet : Re: Civ 7
De : spallshurgenson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Spalls Hurgenson)
Groupes : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic
Date : 24. Aug 2024, 17:06:08
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <nn0kcjp8ako61jrpsq305k6jm5aab4tabj@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 21:34:49 +0200, Kyonshi <gmkeros@gmail.com> wrote:

On 8/9/2024 1:38 AM, Zaghadka wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 11:00:17 -0400, in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,
Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
 
They'll get my money regardless.
>
>
1991 Civilization
  1996 Civilization II
    (1999 Alpha Centauri)
       2001 Civilization III
         2005 Civilization IV
           2009 Civilization V
             2016 Civilization VI
               2024 Civilization VII ???
                   2026  PROFI
 
>
There also was Civilization: Call to Power, which I think was quite the
swell game. It managed to get a sequel without the Civilization moniker,
unfortunately that was the end of that series.

Civ:CTP was made by an entirely different group though, largely as a
result of Activision briefly getting license to the brand (a license
which lasted all of a year before it reverted, hence the sequel
lacking the "Civilization" name ;-)

It wasn't a bad game, but it didn't really stand out either. It was
fairly average. Its most exciting feature is that it was one of the
earliest retail games ported to Linux (and BeOS, if I recall, back
when people thought that OS still had legs!). But it doesn't really
fit into the Civilization pantheon (even if a few of its ideas were
borrowed for Civ3). It's a side-project, similar to "CivCity: Rome" or
"Civilization: Beyond Earth"; games which share some similarities in
gameplay but whose strongest connection is the branding, not the
mechanics.

There was also "Advanced Civilization", which was a sop thrown to
Avalon Hills when they got upset that Microprose created a game that
bore some vague similarities to their board game and didn't pay them
for the privilege. ;-)



Date Sujet#  Auteur
10 Jun 24 * Civ 733Kyonshi
11 Jun 24 +* Re: Civ 72Spalls Hurgenson
11 Jun 24 i`- Re: Civ 71Kyonshi
12 Jun 24 `* Re: Civ 730Rin Stowleigh
13 Jun 24  `* Re: Civ 729Kyonshi
14 Jun 24   `* Re: Civ 728Rin Stowleigh
14 Jun 24    `* Re: Civ 727Kyonshi
15 Jun 24     `* Re: Civ 726Rin Stowleigh
15 Jun 24      `* Re: Civ 725<smaug
15 Jun 24       `* Re: Civ 724Rin Stowleigh
15 Jun 24        `* Re: Civ 723<smaug
16 Jun 24         `* Re: Civ 722Rin Stowleigh
16 Jun 24          `* Re: Civ 721Kyonshi
16 Jun 24           `* Re: Civ 720Rin Stowleigh
16 Jun 24            `* Re: Civ 719Kyonshi
16 Jun 24             `* Re: Civ 718Rin Stowleigh
17 Jun 24              `* Re: Civ 717Kyonshi
17 Jun 24               `* Re: Civ 716Rin Stowleigh
18 Jun 24                `* Re: Civ 715Kyonshi
18 Jun 24                 `* Re: Civ 714Rin Stowleigh
18 Jun 24                  `* Re: Civ 713<smaug
19 Jun 24                   `* Re: Civ 712Rin Stowleigh
19 Jun 24                    `* Re: Civ 711Kyonshi
19 Jun 24                     `* Re: Civ 710Rin Stowleigh
19 Jun 24                      `* Re: Civ 79Kyonshi
20 Jun 24                       `* Re: Civ 78Rin Stowleigh
20 Jun 24                        `* Re: Civ 77Kyonshi
16 Jul 24                         `* Re: Civ 76Samuel Söderberg
17 Jul 24                          `* Re: Civ 75Spalls Hurgenson
9 Aug 24                           `* Re: Civ 74Zaghadka
9 Aug 24                            +- Re: Civ 71Spalls Hurgenson
23 Aug 24                            `* Re: Civ 72Kyonshi
24 Aug 24                             `- Re: Civ 71Spalls Hurgenson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal