Sujet : Re: Flatbed scanner ... pros/cons
De : thomas.e.elam (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Tom Elam)
Groupes : comp.sys.mac.advocacyDate : 02. Sep 2024, 14:13:40
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vb4a5k$2r69a$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 9/1/2024 7:25 PM, -hh wrote:
Looking at replacing an old Canon 'CanoScan LiDE 110' that seems to be fading away (bulb's going yellow).
Its USB connected; I use it quite a bit w/MacOS's "Image Capture" app, and documents to PDF.
Looking around at equivalents, I think I've narrowed it down to two:
* Canon CanoScan LiDE 400
* Epson Perfection V39 II
It looks like both are currently supported in MacOS Sonoma 14.x
Any particular plus/minus or other observations? Cost difference is negligible ($80 vs $90).
A couple of things that I've found:
* Epson is USB-2 (disappointing) & has separate power supply
* Canon claims USB-C but not which flavor/version thereof.
* Documentation isn't clear if the Epson supports scan-to-PDF.
Thoughts?
-hh
Why a single purpose scanner when for a little more your can scan, print on paper/photo, and fax? Why USB? HP and others have all-in-one wireless devices with document feed for scanning multiple pages or can be used as a flatbed. My HP all-in-one supports 1200 dpi scans, do you really need more or is it an issue with the size of the scan bed?