Re: Flatbed scanner ... pros/cons

Liste des GroupesRevenir à csm advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Flatbed scanner ... pros/cons
De : thomas.e.elam (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Tom Elam)
Groupes : comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Date : 06. Sep 2024, 16:59:40
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vbf5cs$rtg4$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 9/2/2024 10:34 AM, -hh wrote:
On 9/2/24 8:13 AM, Tom Elam wrote:
On 9/1/2024 7:25 PM, -hh wrote:
Looking at replacing an old Canon 'CanoScan LiDE 110' that seems to be fading away (bulb's going yellow).
>
Its USB connected; I use it quite a bit w/MacOS's "Image Capture" app, and documents to PDF.
>
Looking around at equivalents, I think I've narrowed it down to two:
>
* Canon CanoScan LiDE 400
>
* Epson Perfection V39 II
>
It looks like both are currently supported in MacOS Sonoma 14.x
>
Any particular plus/minus or other observations?  Cost difference is negligible ($80 vs $90).
>
A couple of things that I've found:
>
* Epson is USB-2 (disappointing) & has separate power supply
* Canon claims USB-C but not which flavor/version thereof.
>
* Documentation isn't clear if the Epson supports scan-to-PDF.
>
>
>
Thoughts?
>
>
-hh
>
Why a single purpose scanner when for a little more your can scan, print on paper/photo, and fax?
 I already have a printer (color laser, networked), so the call here is for a small footprint device on the desk for the workflow.
 
Why USB? HP and others have all-in-one wireless devices with document feed for scanning multiple pages or can be used as a flatbed.
 I have wireless printing already too; don't really see much utility in having a wireless scanner that's more than an arm's length away from the keyboard.
 Plus a lot of the documents are single pages (for document tracking) and have been folded (feed reliability), so bulk sheet feeding isn't
 
My HP all-in-one supports 1200 dpi scans, do you really need more or is it an issue with the size of the scan bed?
 The all-in-ones take up quite a bit more room (and I don't need another printer .. especially an inkjet), which doesn't fit well with my desktop setup:  I presently have a low profile flatbed right next to my keyboard, so from a work motion standpoint, it is "fingertip" close.  No having to get up or twisting around to put papers on/off, etc.
  -hh
 
That last paragraph precisely describes my setup. My wireless HP printer/scanner is accessible from where I'm sitting typing this reply. The wireless HP laser is next to it.  But I see your point if your printer is somewhere else and a need more than 1200 dpi. I scan a LOT of multi-page documents for upload to CAP sites. This HP is very reliable, even if the pages are dinged up a bit.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
2 Sep 24 * Flatbed scanner ... pros/cons17-hh
2 Sep 24 +- Re: Flatbed scanner ... pros/cons1Alan
2 Sep 24 +* Re: Flatbed scanner ... pros/cons12Tom Elam
2 Sep 24 i+* Re: Flatbed scanner ... pros/cons2-hh
6 Sep 24 ii`- Re: Flatbed scanner ... pros/cons1Tom Elam
2 Sep 24 i`* Re: Flatbed scanner ... pros/cons9Alan
6 Sep 24 i `* Re: Flatbed scanner ... pros/cons8Tom Elam
6 Sep 24 i  `* Re: Flatbed scanner ... pros/cons7-hh
7 Sep 24 i   `* Re: Flatbed scanner ... pros/cons6Tom Elam
7 Sep 24 i    +* Re: Flatbed scanner ... pros/cons3Alan
11 Sep 24 i    i`* Re: Flatbed scanner ... pros/cons2Tom Elam
11 Sep 24 i    i `- Re: Flatbed scanner ... pros/cons1Alan
7 Sep 24 i    `* Re: Flatbed scanner ... pros/cons2-hh
7 Sep 24 i     `- Re: Flatbed scanner ... pros/cons1Alan
6 Sep 24 `* Re: Flatbed scanner ... pros/cons3Alan
6 Sep 24  `* Re: Flatbed scanner ... pros/cons2-hh
6 Sep 24   `- Re: Flatbed scanner ... pros/cons1Alan

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal