Re: "Performance king"

Liste des GroupesRevenir à csm advocacy 
Sujet : Re: "Performance king"
De : nuh-uh (at) *nospam* nope.com (Alan)
Groupes : comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Date : 11. Nov 2024, 18:10:57
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vgtdr1$137at$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2024-11-11 07:03, Danart wrote:
  > Alan wrote:
 > 'Apple's M4 Max is the single-core performance king in Geekbench 6
— M4 > Max beats the Core Ultra 9 285K and Ryzen 9 9950X
 > > All that power is in a small package.'
 > > https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/apples-m4-max-is- the-single-core-performance-king-in-geekbench-6-m4-max-beats-the-core- ultra-9-285k-and-ryzen-9-9950x
  > > 'On the x86 end, AMD and Intel pale in contrast. The M4 Max handily
  > keeps up even in multi-core at a fraction of the power—beating
Intel's > Core Ultra 9 285K by around 19% in the single-core category and 16%
in > the multi-core category. Compared to the Ryzen 9 9950X, the M4 Max  > showed 18% higher single-core performance and 25% higher multi-core
  > performance.'
 > > But there are those who believe that Apple is terrible at chip
design.
 > > :-)
 Lets be frank. Remember when the Power-Mac tower quad
came out?
Sure. Let's be frank. And yes, I remember.

The M-series are all ARM processors. Literally an array of them
alongside other chips that have little or nothing to do with it at
all. One chip literally is there for decoding ( if it is used ), that
is literally a Sega Saturn VCD adapter add-on or Super Gameboy.
Yes I will admit that as a base the OSX or MacOS ( whatever it is
called now ), could be used in terms of VMware emulation. Which has
now achieved Direct X 12 usage via specific settings on OSX/MacOS (
which I am not going into ).
What do you suppose any of that actually meant?

 Yes in terms of that I could replace my Windows desktop, and load my
Linux, or whatever via emulation terms.
Again, not what I would call a sentence that's parseable for meaning.

...............
 There is not really anything any sane person can do with any Apple
device outside of
 1. Work ( programming )
2. Work ( in terms of a dating scammer )
 Apple is not and has never been about fun at all. You have some girl
who thinks Apple is a great thing, but it is really just a computer
for people who have no idea how computers work. At it's core all Apple
computers and devices suck because of that fact.
Most people have no interest in HOW a computer works.
That is NORMAL.

...............
 Why have Apple anything? you literally have to call them at some point
to get your machine to work, and you have to have an account you log
into with them.
Utterly false.

................
 Apple is a subscription then a machine.
  This is a response to the post seen at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=677662414#677662414
 

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Nov 24 * "Performance king"12Alan
4 Nov 24 +* Re: "Performance king"7Tom Elam
4 Nov 24 i`* Re: "Performance king"6Alan
5 Nov 24 i +* Re: "Performance king"3Tom Elam
5 Nov 24 i i+- Re: "Performance king"1Alan
5 Nov 24 i i`- Re: "Performance king"1Your Name
5 Nov 24 i `* Re: "Performance king"2Tom Elam
5 Nov 24 i  `- Re: "Performance king"1Alan
4 Nov 24 +* Re: "Performance king"2badgolferman
4 Nov 24 i`- Re: "Performance king"1Alan
11 Nov 24 `* Re: "Performance king"2Danart
11 Nov 24  `- Re: "Performance king"1Alan

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal