Re: An explanation of why Apple trolls are afraid of the truth about Apple

On 2025-02-26 09:39, Marion wrote:

On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 00:24:49 -0000 (UTC), badgolferman wrote :
  An example is Alan Baker claims to own a BMW and yet he doesn't know the first thing about bimmers because his decision was based not on thinking about bimmers, but in following what he perceived the herd to be doing.

I claim to own a BMW...
...because I DO own a BMW.
A 2012 BMW 135i M Sport to be precise.
This one:
<https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/18APIAMjtJE4zSNkl6RiDrOWSLc-
MLS9Z?usp=share_link>
That includes a video from a few years ago, with my 135, my (mine then)
RF89 Van Diemen, my RF98 Van Diemen, my Dodge 1500 pickup truck, and (in
the background not mentioned) my 1990 Mazda Miata (also now sold).

 Given Alan Baker's entire mentality is that of a herd animal, it's not surprising Alan Baker doesn't know anything about the betrayal of Norway.
 All Alan Baker knows about Norwegian history is this one betrayal. Anyone who thinks for themselves, is, to Alan Baker, betraying the herd.

I know only a little about the betrayal of Norway, Arlen, that's true.
Unlike you, I have no problem admitting when my knowledge is limited.
But I AM something of a WWII buff, given that my father was English and
his father served in the RAF.

Since you think logically on your own, without mindlessly following the Apple herd animals, Alan Baker feels you've "betrayed" the newsgroup.

 >

Essentially, your ability to think on your own is a 'betrayal' in his mind. That's how these mindless herd animals actually think.

Let's see if Quisling can "think for himself" "logically" enough to
acknowledge to you that you're full of it when you say I can't own a BMW because I don't "follow the herd" of BMW owners sufficiently to know which BMWs "bimmer" and "beemer" are used for.