Re: An explanation of why Apple trolls are afraid of the truth about Apple

On 2/26/2025 12:39 PM, Marion wrote:

On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 00:24:49 -0000 (UTC), badgolferman wrote :
 

I had to look up what "51" meant, where perhaps it's a reference to...

>
Alan has an insulting name he uses for me so I have adopted one for him as
well. 51 refers to the 51st state.

 Oh, thanks. Apparently 51 is also slang for people who are mentally ill
(although it's more often called "5051" in the normal police code jargon).
 As you are aware, I've studied all of these strange Apple trolls, because
they can't think on their own; they're 100% wired to be herd animals.
 To these Apple trolls who can't think on their own, there is safety in
number, which is why you'll see them desperate for affirmation stats.
 Haven't you noticed how desperate the Apple trolls are for affirmation that
their chosen herd, the Apple ecosystem, comprises only Apple herd animals?
 I don't fit into their herd-animal mentality because I think for myself.
So they hate me.
It's not so much they directly hate me. They directly "fear" me.
Because I can think outside of the herd. And that's what they hate.
 Anyone who can think outside of their herd mentality, is someone to be
feared because that person will tell them what they won't like about Apple.
 So you're "dangerous" to them because you threaten their herd mentality.
 They seem to dislike you because you too can think for yourself outside of
their Apple herd mentality - so people like Alan Baker are afraid of you.
 The reason they're herd animals is there is "protection" in the herd.
Instead of making their own choices, they follow the herd instead.
 They assume if everyone else is doing it, then it must be the right thing.
This herd-animal mentality is critical for understanding Alan Baker's mind.
 Knowing Alan Baker is who he is "because" he's a herd animal is exactly why
he can't scratch the surface on *any* topic - because the herd does his
thinking for him. He doesn't bother to think any deeper than the surface.
 An example is Alan Baker claims to own a BMW and yet he doesn't know the
first thing about bimmers because his decision was based not on thinking
about bimmers, but in following what he perceived the herd to be doing.
 Given Alan Baker's entire mentality is that of a herd animal, it's not
surprising Alan Baker doesn't know anything about the betrayal of Norway.
 All Alan Baker knows about Norwegian history is this one betrayal.
Anyone who thinks for themselves, is, to Alan Baker, betraying the herd.
 Since you think logically on your own, without mindlessly following the
Apple herd animals, Alan Baker feels you've "betrayed" the newsgroup.
 Essentially, your ability to think on your own is a 'betrayal' in his mind.
That's how these mindless herd animals actually think.
 Every time Alan Baker tells you that you've "betrayed the herd", he's
informing all of us that he can't think outside the Apple herd animal mind.
 It's why he is who he is.
He's a herd animal - so by thinking - you've 'betrayed' his chosen herd.

That is some kind of twisted logic! Alan does own a BMW. His family sold it to him at what he admitted was a sweetheart deal price. It's 13 years old now and a 1 series. Before that he had a clapped out red Miata. It used to be in his Facebook image.
Anyway, pooling people based on their mobile phone brand is totally ludicrous.