Sujet : Re: Early History of Mac OS X Dock
De : liz (at) *nospam* poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham)
Groupes : comp.sys.mac.vintageDate : 16. Jan 2025, 14:08:54
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Poppy Records
Message-ID : <1r69858.1ffd7jy1aqrlfcN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : MacSOUP/2.4.6
scole <
vintageapplemac@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <1r5zwor.15ub1rpf2vodeN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>,
liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
<snip>
I hate the Dock with a vengeance, it has spoilt the Mac platform for me.
I first used a Mac in 2007, a MacBook running OSX Tiger, so I have only
ever known the Dock really and, in honesty, I've never had a problem with
it. Seems like a fine way to keep useful apps close at hand for quick
launching.
I usually make the Dock as small as possible, or close enough to it, and
have a couple of dozen or so app icons on it. Works well for me!
That's what the Launcher used to do - except that the icons could be
arranged logically according to your needs and they had names so you
could see instantly what they were.
The Windowshade was activated by double-clicking on the titlke bar of a
window, the window just rolled up to reveal what was underneath but the
title bar stayed exactly where it was. Double-clicking the title bar a
second time rolled the window back down. Thus, if you wanted to see
what was under a window you did a double-click and another double-click
in exactly the same place; there was no need to open the dock and go
searching through the icons to find out where your window had gone.
If that system were re-introduced and the Dock abolished, it would be
hailed as a great step forward in useability.
-- ~ Liz Tuddenham ~(Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)www.poppyrecords.co.uk