Sujet : Re: NAS Backup solution?
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.sys.raspberry-piDate : 29. Jun 2025, 00:13:07
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <103psu3$142ke$11@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk)
On Sat, 28 Jun 2025 08:19:07 +0200, Deloptes wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
You were the one making a big deal out of some kind of special
snapshotting system. Is that statement inoperative now?
I do not think so. Everything is valid. I am afraid you either lack the
capacity or the experience to understand.
You were the one asking me to look at LVM snapshots, as though they had
some relevance to the discussion. Do you backpedal from that now?
And I personally did test complete restore of a whole production
environment: 10 blade servers with 40+ VMs, 3 bare metal servers,
varios databases, etc. etc. ...
Presumably you were relying on the applications themselves (e.g. DBMSes)
to recover from inconsistencies in their data. Things are always easier
when they’re Someone Else’s Problem, aren’t they?
You know, at the end may be it is better for you to stick to rsync.
Simple minds - simple tools.
Fun fact: Andrew Tridgell, who originally created rsync, did his PhD
thesis on the algorithm it uses that allows two processes on different
machines to compare two files, one on each side, without having to copy
the bulk of either one of them over the network to the other side.
Veritas Appliances never had anything like that, did they?