Re: RP2350 and Pico 2 - things missing

In article <20240829102839.5bb67af25e568ebabc65ede6@eircom.net>,
steveo@eircom.net says...

 
On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 09:32:49 +0100
Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
 

I don?t think I?d fault either decision though the fact that we?ve
ended up with two conventions does make writing/maintaining portable
code a bit more annoying,

 
Portable code should only rely on the standards not
implementations, some very weird possibilities are legal within the
standard.

 
Heh, yes. I worked for several years on a machine where a null pointer
wasn't all bits zero, and where char* was a different size to any other
pointer.