Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cs raspberry-pi 
Sujet : Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates
De : <bp (at) *nospam* www.zefox.net>
Groupes : comp.sys.raspberry-pi
Date : 01. Sep 2024, 17:12:50
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vb23q2$1huca$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : tin/2.6.2-20221225 ("Pittyvaich") (FreeBSD/14.0-RELEASE-p9 (arm64))
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Sun, 1 Sep 2024 00:23:58 -0000 (UTC), bp wrote:
 
Lawrence D'Oliviero's reply following yours touches on what I suspect is
my greatest misunderstanding: I thought a self-signed certificate stood
on its own.
 
You can do it that way. That requires importing every single self-signed
cert one by one.

That's what I thought the instructions cited in the FreeBSD Handbook did
and what I was trying to do initially. 


If you need several of these, then setting up your own CA
just makes things simpler.

It appears there's something fundamental that I'm not understanding 8-(

In principle it would make sense to make a root CA for the
three domains (zefox.com, zefox.net and zefox.org) under my control
but if I disturb that one CA up all three become unreliable. I'm
starting with one domain (and its only physical host) in an attempt
to grade the learning curve a little flatter.

Thanks for writing!

bob prohaska


Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Aug 24 * Chromium and self-signed certificates25<bp
14 Aug 24 +- Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 Aug 24 `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates23Richard Kettlewell
15 Aug 24  `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates22<bp
31 Aug 24   `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates21<bp
31 Aug 24    +* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates8Richard Kettlewell
1 Sep 24    i`* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates7<bp
1 Sep 24    i +* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Sep 24    i i`* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates4<bp
2 Sep 24    i i `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Sep 24    i i  `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates2<bp
3 Sep 24    i i   `- Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates1Richard Kettlewell
1 Sep 24    i `- Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates1Richard Kettlewell
1 Sep 24    `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates12Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Sep 24     `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates11<bp
1 Sep 24      `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates10Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Sep 24       `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates9<bp
1 Sep 24        `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates8Richard Kettlewell
1 Sep 24         `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates7<bp
2 Sep 24          +* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Sep 24          i`* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates3<bp
8 Sep 24          i `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
9 Sep 24          i  `- Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates1<bp
2 Sep 24          `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates2Richard Kettlewell
3 Sep 24           `- Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates1Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal