Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cs raspberry-pi 
Sujet : Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates
De : <bp (at) *nospam* www.zefox.net>
Groupes : comp.sys.raspberry-pi
Date : 07. Sep 2024, 02:39:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vbgark$10tpi$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : tin/2.6.2-20221225 ("Pittyvaich") (FreeBSD/14.0-RELEASE-p9 (arm64))
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Sun, 1 Sep 2024 22:49:42 -0000 (UTC), bp wrote:
 
Are the certificates and keys the same between SSH and TLS?
 
The basic encryption algorithms may be the same, but the usage is a little
different. SSH has no concept of “certificates”, only of “host keys”
versus “user keys”. Each key is of course actually a key pair, consisting
of a public key (freely redistributable, but recipients need to be sure
they get them from a trusted source) and a corresponding private key
(never to be disclosed to anybody else).
 
There is a file in your SSH client config called “known_hosts”, which
contains the public host keys of all the hosts you’ve previously connected
to; this is used to guard against somebody trying to impersonate any of
those hosts when you next try to connect.

I was confusing host keys and server certificates. One more puzzle down.

Your scripts seem to work on both FreeBSD and RasPiOS. Now to see if
I can stumble through making them work between _between_ FreeBSD and
RasPiOS. One obvious question is setting the "listen_addr" in the
try_server script. Can it be set to "any" or a range by IP or FQEN?
A list would be fine, I have only eight addresses total.
 
Thank you!

bob prohaska


Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Aug 24 * Chromium and self-signed certificates25<bp
14 Aug 24 +- Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 Aug 24 `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates23Richard Kettlewell
15 Aug 24  `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates22<bp
31 Aug 24   `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates21<bp
31 Aug 24    +* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates8Richard Kettlewell
1 Sep 24    i`* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates7<bp
1 Sep 24    i +* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Sep 24    i i`* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates4<bp
2 Sep 24    i i `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Sep 24    i i  `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates2<bp
3 Sep 24    i i   `- Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates1Richard Kettlewell
1 Sep 24    i `- Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates1Richard Kettlewell
1 Sep 24    `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates12Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Sep 24     `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates11<bp
1 Sep 24      `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates10Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Sep 24       `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates9<bp
1 Sep 24        `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates8Richard Kettlewell
1 Sep 24         `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates7<bp
2 Sep 24          +* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Sep 24          i`* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates3<bp
8 Sep 24          i `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
9 Sep 24          i  `- Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates1<bp
2 Sep 24          `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates2Richard Kettlewell
3 Sep 24           `- Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates1Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal