Liste des Groupes | Revenir à cs raspberry-pi |
On 12/9/24 10:50, The Natural Philosopher wrote:No it isnt that at all.On 08/12/2024 19:50, David Higton wrote:I was surprised you'd use MTBF for a component which is expected to steadily deteriorate due to wear and tear.In message <vj1d28$31v9g$12@dont-email.me>>
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>It's an interesting thought as to why one would use a fan at all. If its>
such a high compute task that you need one, maybe a bigger Pi or an
Intel based machine is indicated.
>
I dislike fans. They fail.
PC fans run pretty much all the time. A fan on a RasPi is likely to
run less of the time, and could well last longer overall.
>
Fans fail. Disc drives fail. SSDs fail. Batteries fail. Reservoir
capacitors fail. But before they do, they are very useful.
>
Such an ArtStudent™ view of life.
>
Do you know what MTBF means?
>
I though MTBF was more a random failure thing.
For some relatively reliable components, such as people, you initially see a relatively low failure rate, but come 80 or 90 years they start dropping like flies, due to wear and tear.Yup. MTBF of peole is about 70 years.
For some things like atomic an atomic nucleus, the failure does seem random, so MTBF seems applicable.Never used.
I don't know which it is for PC fans, but would assume it is more wear and tear than random.In general fans fail for one reason only. Bearing failure. The cheapos use phosphor bronze plain bushes and these dry out and seize up, wear out and get noisy and start slowing down or get clogged with people's cruft.
--
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.