Sujet : Re: Stress testing a Pi...
De : theom+news (at) *nospam* chiark.greenend.org.uk (Theo)
Groupes : comp.sys.raspberry-piDate : 11. May 2024, 17:18:10
Autres entêtes
Organisation : University of Cambridge, England
Message-ID : <+vD*qA+Jz@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : tin/1.8.3-20070201 ("Scotasay") (UNIX) (Linux/5.10.0-28-amd64 (x86_64))
The Natural Philosopher <
tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 11/05/2024 14:54, Theo wrote:
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
So I am thinking of going to a PI 5 rather than a separately powered USB
adapters for the drives - the other way to increase power to the drives.
>
Or is there a better one board computer alternative?
>
I want to build everything into a small 19" case with an ethernet switch
board and OSUs to reduce clutter
If you want a Pi5 NAS, this looks like a good option:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l30sADfDiM8
Key part is the Radxa PCIe to 5x SATA HAT:
https://arace.tech/products/radxa-penta-sata-hat-up-to-5x-sata-disks-hat-for-raspberry-pi-5
(For 3.5" drives, there are cables so you can mount them away from the
board. USB HDD often have a SATA connector inside if you remove the
case)
That may be an option all right - it takes external 12V which I can
probably supply.
And there is one for a Pi 4...
I think the Radxa Pi4 one was released just before all the supply chain
mayhem when nobody could buy Pi 4s - I think they discontinued it so I'm
not sure it's actually available right now. On the Pi 4 you have to use USB
rather than PCIe, unless using a Compute Module (when you lose USB3).
I'd expect PCIe to be more stable under load than USB. They use a JMB585
PCIe to SATA chip which isn't enterprise grade but seems to work well
enough. Since Pi5 doesn't lose USB3, you can get 2.5G networking via a $10
USB adapter, rather than Jeff's odd PCIe switch.
The Pi4 was just a bit compromised for this use case IMO, but it looks like
the Pi5 plus this HAT gets most things right.
Theo