Re: Google Groups

In article <v4agua$160mo$1@dont-email.me>,
   Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> wrote:

On 11/06/2024 13:19, Bob Latham wrote:

In article <v49brp$urgb$1@dont-email.me>,
    Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> wrote:
 
 

YouTuber, Susan Oliver, and her dog Cindy, deal with John Campbell in
multiple videos:

 

<https://www.youtube.com/@Backtothescience>

 

She also gives an interesting discussion of AstraZeneca Covid vaccine.

 

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49DjUSD8aWQ>

 
 
Reaction as I expected. :-)
 
He didn't wrte the papers or create the data.
 

There are many bad academic papers, Campbell picks them and
misrepresents the results to boost his YouTube subscribers. If you
watched Susan Oliver's critiques, it might become clearer to you.
No one wants to watch John Campbell repeatedly telling them the
pandemic is over, so he tells them some bollocks, about a vaccine
conspiracy, and they continue subscribing.

Several things show up in your text. You refer to him as Campbell so
your opinion is biased before you start. You make no mention of peer
reviewed. You tell me one persons review is accurate and Dr. Campbell
is bollocks but that just means you like one narrative more than
another. You of course suggest that you opinion is fact but give no
evidence.

I did learn one new pithy idea...

Brandolini's law: The amount of energy needed to refute bullshit is
an order of magnitude bigger than that needed to produce it.

Oh, I quite agree with that. Strange that you don't see it applies to
narrative follows the most.

Anyway believe what you will, the truth is coming out but very, very
slowly, many arses to cover.

Bob.