Re: Google Groups

On 12/06/2024 09:42, Bob Latham wrote:

In article <v4agua$160mo$1@dont-email.me>,
    Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> wrote:

On 11/06/2024 13:19, Bob Latham wrote:

In article <v49brp$urgb$1@dont-email.me>,
     Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> wrote:
>
>

YouTuber, Susan Oliver, and her dog Cindy, deal with John Campbell in
multiple videos:

>

<https://www.youtube.com/@Backtothescience>

>

She also gives an interesting discussion of AstraZeneca Covid vaccine.

>

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49DjUSD8aWQ>

>
>
Reaction as I expected. :-)
>
He didn't wrte the papers or create the data.
>

 

There are many bad academic papers, Campbell picks them and
misrepresents the results to boost his YouTube subscribers. If you
watched Susan Oliver's critiques, it might become clearer to you.
No one wants to watch John Campbell repeatedly telling them the
pandemic is over, so he tells them some bollocks, about a vaccine
conspiracy, and they continue subscribing.

 Several things show up in your text. You refer to him as Campbell so
your opinion is biased before you start.

I have known about John Campbell for years. Yes, I had a very low opinion of him before your post. Call that bias, if you want.

You make no mention of peer
reviewed. You tell me one persons review is accurate and Dr. Campbell
is bollocks but that just means you like one narrative more than
another. You of course suggest that you opinion is fact but give no
evidence.

I gave the evidence of the Susan Oliver videos. She points out errors in John Campbell's arguments. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to understand them, from first principles.