Sujet : Re: Releasing the TV before shutting down ?
De : address (at) *nospam* is.invalid (R.Wieser)
Groupes : comp.sys.raspberry-piDate : 31. Jul 2024, 15:36:01
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v8di58$1kn02$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
mm0fmf,
This SRB: Standard Rudy Behaviour
>
Look up his previous questions and replies in the archives. He'll ask a
question, people make suggestions, he'll not find any of the suggestions
acceptable or there'll be extra information provided after the suggestions
that makes the situation different. And it goes on for a while. Lather,
rinse, repeat.
You forget to mention the part where I, /way/ to often, have to tell poster
that what they offer isn't what I specifically asked for in the first post -
or worse, offering work-arounds which I already mentioned in that first post
and not wanted to use.
... and than try to make it sound as if its all my fault, and sometimes as a
result, as with you, bear a (life-long?) grudge.
Kid, I've encountered too many "helpfull" people who just skipped the
question and pretty-much demanded that I should accept their work-arounds as
*the* solution. Others who claimed all kinds of things, but could, when
pressed for it, not come up with any kind of substanciation, let alone
proof, for any of it.
Its also remarkable (not really) that you make a claim of wrongdoing, but am
not supporting that claim in any way. Nothing by anything in this thread,
not by linking to any other one*. I know, I know. Putting your mouth where
your money is is /dangerous/, as you could be proven wrong (like the last
time?). :-)
* just a "go find yourself what the proof of my claim is" dismissing
handwaving. Something rather dishonest those "knights of claim-a-lot" seem
to grocer in ...
Regards,
Rudy Wieser