Sujet : Re: RP2350 and Pico 2 - things missing
De : steveo (at) *nospam* eircom.net (Ahem A Rivet's Shot)
Groupes : comp.sys.raspberry-piDate : 30. Aug 2024, 14:40:30
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20240830144030.5bc5c9f67b800e2336af3346@eircom.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
User-Agent : Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd14.0)
On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 14:28:06 +0100
John Aldridge <
jpsa@cantab.net> wrote:
In article <20240829191334.570e88c7507598ffe5b28d87@eircom.net>,
steveo@eircom.net says...
Portable code should only rely on the standards not
implementations, some very weird possibilities are legal within the
standard.
Heh, yes. I worked for several years on a machine where a null
pointer wasn't all bits zero, and where char* was a different size to
any other pointer.
That rings vague bells, what was it ?
Prime. It was word, not byte, addressed, so a char* had to be bigger.
Thank you, that was indeed the bell it rang. I only heard about it,
never met it.
-- Steve O'Hara-SmithOdds and Ends at http://www.sohara.org/For forms of government let fools contestWhate're is best administered is best - Alexander Pope