Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cs raspberry-pi 
Sujet : Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates
De : invalid (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (Richard Kettlewell)
Groupes : comp.sys.raspberry-pi
Date : 01. Sep 2024, 19:28:39
Autres entêtes
Organisation : terraraq NNTP server
Message-ID : <wwvfrqjns88.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
<bp@www.zefox.net> writes:
That much I gathered. Still, it looks like there are are three uses for
encrypted, authenticated communications between hosts: Mail, web traffic
and remote logins. SSL is installed and working for remote logins on all
the hosts under my control by default.

Possibly you have confused SSL with SSH (SSL/TLS can in principle be
used for remote login but it’s unusual to do so).

Can a single ssl/tls configuration support all three services?

If all multiple TLS-equipped services same domain name you can use a
single key and certificate for all three of them.

Am I wrong to think of ssl and tls as one thing?

SSL was renamed to TLS in 1999 when TLS 1.0 was introduced. So different
versions of the same thing.

SSH is a different protocol.

--
https://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/

Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Aug 24 * Chromium and self-signed certificates25<bp
14 Aug 24 +- Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 Aug 24 `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates23Richard Kettlewell
15 Aug 24  `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates22<bp
31 Aug 24   `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates21<bp
31 Aug 24    +* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates8Richard Kettlewell
1 Sep 24    i`* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates7<bp
1 Sep 24    i +* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Sep 24    i i`* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates4<bp
2 Sep 24    i i `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Sep 24    i i  `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates2<bp
3 Sep 24    i i   `- Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates1Richard Kettlewell
1 Sep 24    i `- Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates1Richard Kettlewell
1 Sep 24    `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates12Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Sep 24     `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates11<bp
1 Sep 24      `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates10Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Sep 24       `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates9<bp
1 Sep 24        `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates8Richard Kettlewell
1 Sep 24         `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates7<bp
2 Sep 24          +* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Sep 24          i`* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates3<bp
8 Sep 24          i `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
9 Sep 24          i  `- Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates1<bp
2 Sep 24          `* Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates2Richard Kettlewell
3 Sep 24           `- Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates1Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal