Sujet : Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates
De : invalid (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (Richard Kettlewell)
Groupes : comp.sys.raspberry-piDate : 01. Sep 2024, 19:28:39
Autres entêtes
Organisation : terraraq NNTP server
Message-ID : <wwvfrqjns88.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
<bp@
www.zefox.net> writes:
That much I gathered. Still, it looks like there are are three uses for
encrypted, authenticated communications between hosts: Mail, web traffic
and remote logins. SSL is installed and working for remote logins on all
the hosts under my control by default.
Possibly you have confused SSL with SSH (SSL/TLS can in principle be
used for remote login but it’s unusual to do so).
Can a single ssl/tls configuration support all three services?
If all multiple TLS-equipped services same domain name you can use a
single key and certificate for all three of them.
Am I wrong to think of ssl and tls as one thing?
SSL was renamed to TLS in 1999 when TLS 1.0 was introduced. So different
versions of the same thing.
SSH is a different protocol.
-- https://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/