Sujet : Re: Chromium and self-signed certificates
De : invalid (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (Richard Kettlewell)
Groupes : comp.sys.raspberry-piDate : 02. Sep 2024, 08:11:14
Autres entêtes
Organisation : terraraq NNTP server
Message-ID : <wwvcylmil7x.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
<bp@
www.zefox.net> writes:
Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
SSL was renamed to TLS in 1999 when TLS 1.0 was introduced. So
different versions of the same thing.
SSH is a different protocol.
>
That clears the fog a little. Are the certificates and keys
the same between SSH and TLS?
There’s an overlap in key types (e.g. both can use ECDSA) but in
practice you wouldn’t normally share keys between them.
The certificates formats are different. Many (probaly most) users don’t
use certificates with SSH at all.
-- https://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/