Sujet : Re: OT: horrible 8086 segmentation
De : invalid (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (Richard Kettlewell)
Groupes : comp.sys.raspberry-piDate : 01. Dec 2024, 16:11:05
Autres entêtes
Organisation : terraraq NNTP server
Message-ID : <wwviks3phfa.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
The Natural Philosopher <
tnp@invalid.invalid> writes:
Robert Roland wrote:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 18:37:02 +0100, Josef Möllers
<josef@invalid.invalid> wrote:
And to consider that, at that time, processors like MC68000 or NS32016
were readily available.
At the time when the design decision was made, the Motorola 68000 was
not ready for production.
From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Personal_Computer :
"The 68000 was considered the best choice,[19] but was not
production-ready like the others."
>
I also remember a zilog Z8000?
Yes, although also with a segmented memory model.
-- https://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/
OT: horrible 8086 segmentation
Re: OT: horrible 8086 segmentation