Sujet : Re: Pi-FAN for RPi4 with 4 (instead of 3) cables?
De : news-1513678000 (at) *nospam* discworld.dascon.de (Michael Schwingen)
Groupes : comp.sys.raspberry-piDate : 10. Dec 2024, 20:30:23
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <slrnvlh5mf.5ca.news-1513678000@a-tuin.ms.intern>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
On 2024-12-09, The Natural Philosopher <
tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
https://www.rs-online.com/designspark/why-l10-life-expectancy-is-key-for-fan-durability-over-mtbf-ratings
>
This is full of bullshit
>
"MTBF estimates the lifespan of a fan’s electronic components, expressed
in millions of hours. In contrast, L10 Service Life, measured in
thousands of hours, is based on the durability of the bearings and
lubrication grease."
>
So a fan with no electronic components has no MTBF?
remove "electronic" and it makes sense.
https://www.digi.com/support/knowledge-base/understanding-mtbf-mean-time-between-failures
>
>
"Furthermore, MTBF specifically excludes wear-out factors"
>
>
Total crap.
No. Again, MTBF characterizes failures during normal service life.
Take a fan which usually fails after 5 years of operation due to wearout,
which happens on all of those fans after about the same amount of time -
those 5 years are *not* parts of the MTBF. MTBF characterizes the
statistical mean time between failures *during* those 5 years due to *other*
reasons.
So you can have a MTBF of 50 years, and a lifetime of 5 years. If you take
100 of those fans, you can expect 2 failures per year - but after 5 years,
the failure rate will rise rapidly to reach 100%.
What matters is how long the repair or the new fan will last. Not
splitting hairs over MTTF versus MTBF
The important thing is to keep MTBF and lifetime separate - both will lead
to failures, but are separate mechanisms.
cu
Michael
-- Some people have no respect of age unless it is bottled.