Re: RP2040 zero

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cs raspberry-pi 
Sujet : Re: RP2040 zero
De : theom+news (at) *nospam* chiark.greenend.org.uk (Theo)
Groupes : comp.sys.raspberry-pi
Date : 06. May 2025, 11:43:37
Autres entêtes
Organisation : University of Cambridge, England
Message-ID : <n-q*2NNbA@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : tin/1.8.3-20070201 ("Scotasay") (UNIX) (Linux/5.10.0-28-amd64 (x86_64))
Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
 
I got some of these seriously cheap from Ali Express, They are
essentially a PI PICO on a much smaller board with fewer  accessible pins.
 
Has anyone used one?
When the PICO2 came out, I bought a couple of PiMoroni 2350 boards, both
smaller than official PICO2 boards, one with USB-C and fewer pins, one
with full set of pins but no USB port on-board ... life intervened so
done nowt with them ... I remember hearing there's something b0rked with
I/O on the 2350s in general, not sure if it's just edge cases or
generally fucked?

https://hackaday.com/2024/09/20/raspberry-pi-rp2350-e9-erratum-redefined-as-input-mode-leakage-current/

basically if you want a pulldown on an input pin there's chunky leakage
current.  That can also affect external circuitry that isn't expecting it,
eg if you have a resistive divider as the leakage could drag the voltage
down.  You can end up with I/Os getting stuck halfway and effectively
latching old values.

That could cause some issues if you're doing a drop in replacement for a
RP2040 but if you use stronger external pullup/pulldowns it should avoid the
issue.

It looks like they haven't done a respin to fix it thus far.

Theo

Date Sujet#  Auteur
6 May11:06 * RP2040 zero21The Natural Philosopher
6 May11:29 `* Re: RP2040 zero20Andy Burns
6 May11:43  `* Re: RP2040 zero19Theo
6 May14:02   +* Re: RP2040 zero12The Natural Philosopher
6 May14:52   i`* Re: RP2040 zero11Andy Burns
6 May15:39   i +- Re: RP2040 zero1The Natural Philosopher
6 May22:21   i `* Re: RP2040 zero9Brian Gregory
6 May23:14   i  +* Re: RP2040 zero7John R Walliker
7 May10:30   i  i`* Re: RP2040 zero6Theo
7 May10:49   i  i `* Re: RP2040 zero5Andy Burns
7 May14:05   i  i  `* Re: RP2040 zero4Theo
7 May15:12   i  i   +* Re: RP2040 zero2John R Walliker
7 May23:41   i  i   i`- Re: RP2040 zero1The Natural Philosopher
7 May23:36   i  i   `- Re: RP2040 zero1The Natural Philosopher
7 May08:45   i  `- Re: RP2040 zero1Andy Burns
6 May14:03   `* Re: RP2040 zero6Andy Burns
6 May14:19    `* Re: RP2040 zero5Theo
6 May14:25     `* Re: RP2040 zero4The Natural Philosopher
6 May14:36      `* Re: RP2040 zero3Theo
6 May15:43       `* Re: RP2040 zero2The Natural Philosopher
7 May00:48        `- Re: RP2040 zero1Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal