Sujet : Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better)
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design comp.sys.raspberry-piDate : 23. Jun 2025, 09:18:16
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <103b2k8$14iu4$6@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk)
On Sun, 22 Jun 2025 20:16:09 +0200, Jeroen Belleman wrote:
"When the only tool you have is a hammer, it is tempting to think of
everything else as a nail."
The thing with Open Source is, you learn to use a range of tools.
Of course, the costs do add up. One tool might only be $0, but then you
realize that’s $0 *per seat*, and the following month you discover you
have to pay another $0 to keep using the tool, and so on every month, or
even every week. Pretty soon you find you’re paying $00, or even $000 if
you don’t keep your costs under control. It’s just too tempting to add
more pieces of software to do more different jobs.
Date | Sujet | # | | Auteur |
17 Jun 25 | SolidWorks is cool, sort of | 38 | | john larkin |
17 Jun 25 |  Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 37 | | Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
18 Jun 25 |   Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 36 | | john larkin |
18 Jun 25 |    Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 35 | | Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
18 Jun 25 |     Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 2 | | Sergey Kubushyn |
18 Jun 25 |      Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 1 | | Crash Gordon |
18 Jun 25 |     Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 32 | | john larkin |
18 Jun 25 |      Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 31 | | Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
18 Jun 25 |       Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 30 | | john larkin |
19 Jun 25 |        Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 29 | | Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
19 Jun 25 |         Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 28 | | john larkin |
19 Jun 25 |          Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 19 | | Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
19 Jun 25 |           Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 18 | | john larkin |
20 Jun 25 |            Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 17 | | Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
20 Jun 25 |             Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 16 | | john larkin |
21 Jun 25 |              Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 15 | | Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
21 Jun 25 |               Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 1 | | piglet |
21 Jun 25 |               Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 2 | | john larkin |
23 Jun 25 |                Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 1 | | Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
22 Jun 25 |               Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 11 | | candycanearter07 |
22 Jun 25 |                Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 8 | | john larkin |
22 Jun 25 |                 Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 4 | | Jeroen Belleman |
23 Jun 25 |                  Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 1 | | john larkin |
23 Jun 25 |                  Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 2 | | Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
23 Jun 25 |                   Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 1 | | john larkin |
22 Jun 25 |                 Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 1 | | The Natural Philosopher |
23 Jun 25 |                 Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 2 | | Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
23 Jun 25 |                  Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 1 | | john larkin |
23 Jun 25 |                Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 2 | | Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
23 Jun 25 |                 Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 1 | | john larkin |
19 Jun 25 |          Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 8 | | Lasse Langwadt |
19 Jun 25 |           Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 7 | | john larkin |
20 Jun 25 |            Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 3 | | Lasse Langwadt |
20 Jun 25 |             Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 2 | | Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
20 Jun 25 |              Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 1 | | john larkin |
20 Jun 25 |            Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 1 | | Robert Riches |
20 Jun 25 |            Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 2 | | The Natural Philosopher |
22 Jun 25 |             Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 1 | | john larkin |