Sujet : Re: That wicked "which"
De : engelbert_buxbaum (at) *nospam* hotmail.com (Dr. Engelbert Buxbauum)
Groupes : comp.text.texDate : 08. Feb 2025, 12:18:36
Autres entêtes
Organisation : privat
Message-ID : <MPG.42115be2411190559896a9@news.eternal-september.org>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.4
In article <
m0k5aqFqurcU1@mid.individual.net>,
peter@silmaril.ie says...
I think those are now historical curiosities which you can ignore.
I think those are now historical curiosities that you can ignore.
Interesting. My (US) teacher insisted that there is a comma in front of
'which', but never in front of 'that', without ever saying why.
What is the difference between 'restrictive' and 'non-restrictive' in
this context?
Re: That wicked "which"
Re: That wicked "which"
