Sujet : Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
De : rjh (at) *nospam* cpax.org.uk (Richard Heathfield)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 14. May 2025, 18:58:18
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Fix this later
Message-ID : <1002ljq$2k04b$4@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 14/05/2025 18:46, olcott wrote:
On 5/14/2025 12:41 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
<snip>
When you try to encode *A PROGRAM* that actually computes for arbitrary program P
I have never been talking about that at any time
in the last five years.
When you talk about overturning the HP proof, that's precisely what you're talking about, whether you know it or not.
PAY ATTENTION !!!
Oh, my dear dear chap - if I thought for a moment you had anything worth paying attention to, I'd be all ears.
But you have nothing but mindless repetition, over and over and OVER. For every article you post, I can pretty much guarantee that I've read 90% of it before.
-- Richard HeathfieldEmail: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999Sig line 4 vacant - apply within