Re: How could HHH report on the behavior of its caller?

On 5/16/2025 8:54 AM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 5/15/25 10:53 PM, olcott wrote:

On 5/15/2025 2:37 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-05-15 01:30:08 +0000, olcott said:
>

void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
   return;
}
>
int main()
{
   DDD();
}
>
If HHH cannot report on the behavior of its caller
because this is a ridiculous requirement then how
can HHH report on the direct execution of DDD()
(AKA its caller).

>
Your HHH can use all information that Flibble's decider can. Flibble's
decider can determine and report that DDD halts.
>

>
I asked you (not Flibble) to show exactly how the requirement
that HHH report on the direct execution of DDD()
[that requires HHH to report on the behavior of its caller]
is not nonsense.
>
I presume that you dodge because you already know that
it is nonsense yet want to remain disagreeable anyway.
>

 How can it be nonsense?

int main()
{
   DDD(); // Can HHH report on the behavior of its caller?
}
<divergence from the question snipped>
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer