Re: Analysis of Flibble’s Latest: Detecting vs. Simulating Infinite Recursion ZFC

On 5/22/2025 11:36 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote:

On 22/05/2025 17:00, olcott wrote:
 <snip>
 

*The proof by contradiction CANNOT EVEN BE CREATED*

 The proof can. It's just the contradiction that can't. That's the point of a proof by contradiction.
 

A proof by contradiction that does not have any
contradiction is not a proof by contradiction.

I dared you to define an input D to termination
analyzer H that actually does the opposite of
whatever value that H returns AND YOU FAILED !!!

 You dared me to do what Turing proved to be impossible, and I declined. Why? Because Turing proved it to be impossible.
 

ARE YOU IGNORANT OR DISHONEST?

 I have no doubt you've already decided that for yourself.
 

You don't have a clue:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halting_problem#Proof_concept
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer