Re: Bad faith and dishonesty

olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:

On 5/25/2025 11:59 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:

olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:

On 5/25/2025 10:49 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 25.mei.2025 om 16:36 schreef olcott:

On 5/25/2025 1:21 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-05-24 01:20:18 +0000, Mr Flibble said:

So much bad faith and dishonesty shown in this forum that myself and
Peter
Olcott have to fight against.

Everything here seems to be dishonesty and protests against dishonesty.
If you could remove all dishonesty the protests woud stop, too, and
nothing would be left.

_DDD()
[00002192] 55             push ebp
[00002193] 8bec           mov ebp,esp
[00002195] 6892210000     push 00002192
[0000219a] e833f4ffff     call 000015d2  // call HHH
[0000219f] 83c404         add esp,+04
[000021a2] 5d             pop ebp
[000021a3] c3             ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [000021a3]

Then acknowledge that DDD simulated by HHH according
to the rules of the x86 language cannot possibly reach
its own "ret" instruction final halt state.

Why repeating this bug in HHH?

That everyone that understands these things
sees that there is no bug ....

That is untrue.  The bug is clear to anybody who understands C code.

OK then to prove that you are not a damned liar
(you won't do this because you know that you are a liar)
show how DDD simulated by HHH according to the rules
of the x86 language reaches its own "ret" instruction
final halt state.

You've got a wierd notion of what it means to be a liar.

FIND THE BUG ASSHOLE !!!

You're not a nice person.  The bug in question has been pointed out many
times, in particular by Fred.

.... makes your statement the kind of reckless disregard for the truth
that loses defamation cases.

Poppycock!

In other words by objective standards: YOU ARE A LIAR

What do you understand about objective standards?  Evidently, very
little.

We know that HHH is unable to reach the reachable 'ret' instruction.
We also know that it not possible to repair HHH. It is impossible for
HHH to simulate itself.

It is also a verified fact that HHH does simulate itself simulating DDD
thus again you are proven to be a liar.

No, it is you who is the liar.  You lie continually by calling things you
would like to be true "verified facts", regardless of the fact that these
assertions have never been verified by anybody other than yourself.

I have fully operational code of HHH correctly
simulating itself simulating DDD dipshit.

You've got fully operational code simulating what sort of dipshit?

--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).