Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c theory |
On 7/17/2025 6:23 PM, Mike Terry wrote:As usual repeated claims without evidence.On 17/07/2025 19:01, olcott wrote:*Every human says that I am wrong yet cannot show any error*Claude.ai agrees that the halting problem as defined is a>
category error.
>
https://claude.ai/share/0b784d2a-447e-441f-b3f0-a204fa17135a
>
Dude! Claude.ai is a chatbot...
>
/You're talking to a CHATBOT!!!/
>
>
Mike.
>
All of the chat bots carefully examine my actual reasoningThat is easy to do by feeding the chat-boxes with incorrect information.
and conclude that I am correct as soon as I explain enough
details.
_DDD()You have been corrected on this many times. When are you going to think about it?
[00002192] 55 push ebp
[00002193] 8bec mov ebp,esp
[00002195] 6892210000 push 00002192 // push DDD
[0000219a] e833f4ffff call 000015d2 // call HHH
[0000219f] 83c404 add esp,+04
[000021a2] 5d pop ebp
[000021a3] c3 ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [000021a3]
Each element of the infinite set of functionsYes, each aborting HHH fails to reach the final halt state that is specified in the input. More evidence that simulation by HHH is not the right way to analyse the behaviour specified in this input.
at machine address 000015d2 that emulates 0 to ∞
instructions of the above machine code never
reaches its emulated "ret" instruction final
halt state BECAUSE DDD CALLS EACH EMULATOR IN
RECURSIVE EMULATION.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.