Re: Real Number --- Merely numbers whose digits can be infinitely long

Sujet : Re: Real Number --- Merely numbers whose digits can be infinitely long
De : wyniijj5 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (wij)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 03. May 2024, 03:44:18

Autres entêtes

Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <26dd28b15c48cfd45d6deb857502b420db677aff.camel@gmail.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Evolution 3.50.2 (3.50.2-1.fc39)

On Thu, 2024-05-02 at 18:02 -0700, Keith Thompson wrote:

wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> writes:
[snip]
Nothing is different from the math. you understand (except several corner cases
which you will never need to worry about).

So there's nothing novel in your notation, and I needn't waste any more
time asking questions about it that you're unwilling and/or unable to
answer.

Is that a fair summary?

(I'll ignore the "corner cases" you allude to.)

No, nothing novel there changed the usual usage of 'fixed point number'.

Date	Sujet	#	Auteur
28 Apr 24	Real Number --- Merely numbers whose digits can be infinitely long	28	wij
29 Apr 24	Re: Real Number --- Merely numbers whose digits can be infinitely long	27	Ben Bacarisse
29 Apr 24	Re: Real Number --- Merely numbers whose digits can be infinitely long	1	Andy Walker
30 Apr 24	Re: Real Number --- Merely numbers whose digits can be infinitely long	25	wij
30 Apr 24	Re: Real Number --- Merely numbers whose digits can be infinitely long	1	Keith Thompson
1 May 24	Re: Real Number --- Merely numbers whose digits can be infinitely long	23	Ben Bacarisse
2 May 24	Re: Real Number --- Merely numbers whose digits can be infinitely long	22	wij
2 May 24	Re: Real Number --- Merely numbers whose digits can be infinitely long	16	Keith Thompson
2 May 24	Re: Real Number --- Merely numbers whose digits can be infinitely long	15	wij
2 May 24	Re: Real Number --- Merely numbers whose digits can be infinitely long	14	Keith Thompson
2 May 24	Re: Real Number --- Merely numbers whose digits can be infinitely long	13	Keith Thompson
2 May 24	Re: Real Number --- Merely numbers whose digits can be infinitely long	12	wij
2 May 24	Re: Real Number --- Merely numbers whose digits can be infinitely long	4	Ross Finlayson
2 May 24	Re: Real Number --- Merely numbers whose digits can be infinitely long	1	Ross Finlayson
2 May 24	Re: Real Number --- Merely numbers whose digits can be infinitely long	2	Andy Walker
2 May 24	Re: Real Number --- Merely numbers whose digits can be infinitely long	1	Ross Finlayson
2 May 24	Re: Real Number --- Merely numbers whose digits can be infinitely long	7	Keith Thompson
3 May 24	Re: Real Number --- Merely numbers whose digits can be infinitely long	6	wij
3 May 24	Re: Real Number --- Merely numbers whose digits can be infinitely long	5	Keith Thompson
3 May 24	Re: Real Number --- Merely numbers whose digits can be infinitely long	4	wij
3 May 24	Re: Real Number --- Merely numbers whose digits can be infinitely long	3	Keith Thompson
3 May 24	Re: Real Number --- Merely numbers whose digits can be infinitely long	2	Ross Finlayson
4 May 24	Re: Real Number --- Merely numbers whose digits can be infinitely long	1	Ross Finlayson
3 May 24	Re: Real Number --- Merely numbers whose digits can be infinitely long	5	Ben Bacarisse
3 May 24	Re: Real Number --- Merely numbers whose digits can be infinitely long	4	wij
4 May 24	Re: Real Number --- Merely numbers whose digits can be infinitely long	3	Ben Bacarisse
4 May 24	Re: Real Number --- Merely numbers whose digits can be infinitely long	2	wij
5 May 24	Re: Real Number --- Merely numbers whose digits can be infinitely long	1	Ben Bacarisse

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal