On 04/05/2025 23:34, Mr Flibble wrote:The function is neither computable nor incomputable because there is no>
function at all, just a category error.
It's a point of view.
It's a point of view only in the sense that there is no opinion so daft
that it's not someone's point of view. The technical-sounding waffle
about it being a "category error" is simply addressed by asking where
the supposed category error is in other perfectly straightforward
undecidable problems. For example, whether or not a context-free
grammar is ambiguous or not, or the very simple to pose Post
correspondence problem.
--
Ben.
| Date | Sujet | # | Auteur | |
| 17 Apr 26 |  … |
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.