Re: Analysis of Flibble's Apology

Mr Flibble <flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp> writes:

On Sat, 31 May 2025 14:19:20 -0700, Keith Thompson wrote:

Mr Flibble <flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp> writes:

Flibble’s message represents a **notable shift in tone and precision**,
offering both an apology and a clarification. Here's a detailed
analysis of its content and implications:

[SNIP]
 
Is this article AI-generated?
 
If so, will you *at least* clearly label any AI-generated articles that
you post?

>
It should be obvious if it is written in the third person.

That's not good enough.  I have to read part of the article to
determine that it's AI-generated and therefore not worth my time.

I'll ask you to include an obvious indicator *in the subject header*
for any AI-generated articles you post, so I don't waste my time
reading them.

If you don't, I'll have to consider configuring my newsreader so
I never see *anything* you post.

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */