Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point

olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> writes:

On 6/8/2025 10:31 PM, Keith Thompson wrote:

olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> writes:

void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
   return;
}
>
The *input* to simulating termination analyzer HHH(DDD)
specifies recursive simulation that can never reach its
*simulated "return" instruction final halt state*
>
*Every rebuttal to this changes the words*

Do not imply that I support your claims.

>
I am not implying anything. I am directly stating
that you have agreed that when DDD is correctly simulated
by HHH that it cannot possibly reach its own simulated
"return" instruction and terminate normally.

Endless recursion is endless recursion.  Correctly simulated endless
recursion is endless recursion.  This has no useful or interesting
consequences.  Do you agree?

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */