Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct

Am Fri, 11 Jul 2025 10:01:33 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 7/11/2025 3:15 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-07-10 14:15:31 +0000, olcott said:

On 7/10/2025 4:09 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-07-09 12:45:54 +0000, olcott said:
>

*Here is HHH matching that pattern*
executed HHH simulates DDD that calls emulated HHH(DDD) that
simulates DDD that calls emulated emulated HHH(DDD)
>
*Here is the 197 page full execution trace of that*
https://liarparadox.org/HHH(DDD)_Full_Trace.pdf

>
That trace is a little long. Where in that trace is the forth level
of recursive simulation statrted?
>

After the non-terminating behavior pattern is matched on line 996
https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c HHH rejects DDD
as specifying non-halting behavior.

 
This is a good example of what I meant in another comment when I said
that you don't answer questions.
 

When you ask an incorrect question, like you did I provide an answer to
the corrected question.

We know you like to twist words or take them literally, aka constructing
strawmen.

--
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.