Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c theory |
wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> writes:On Wed, 2024-05-01 at 22:58 +0100, Ben Bacarisse wrote:[...]wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> writes:[...]<fixed_point_number>::= [-] <wnum> [ . <frac> ] // excluding "-0" case
<wnum>::= 0
<wnum>::= <nzd> { 0 | <nzd> }
<frac>::= { 0 | <nzd> } <nzd>
<nzd> ::= 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 // 'digit' varys depending on n-ary
Ex: 78, -12.345, 3.1414159
So what's the point of defining these strings that represent a subset of
the rationals?
<fixed_point_number> is a super set of rationals.
An extraordinary claim.
Do you agree that 1/3 is a rational number? How is 1/3 represented in
your <fixed_point_number> notation?
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.