Re: Repeating decimals are irrational

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c theory 
Sujet : Re: Repeating decimals are irrational
De : wyniijj5 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (wij)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 27. Mar 2024, 01:34:15
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <c75f33b5df723f71bae7a7a1c125abba782bab85.camel@gmail.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Evolution 3.50.2 (3.50.2-1.fc39)
On Tue, 2024-03-26 at 16:22 -0700, Keith Thompson wrote:
wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> writes:
On Tue, 2024-03-26 at 15:55 -0700, Keith Thompson wrote:
[...]
Do you understand what a mathematical limit is?  Can you explain it?
 
If you understand limits, you should be able to understand that
0.333..., where the "..." denotes the limit as the number of 3s exceeds
without bound, is exactly equal to 1/3.
 
[...]
 
 
I already stated it the file:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/cscall/files/MisFiles/RealNumber-en.txt/download
 
OK, in that file you wrote:
 
    Ex1: A= lim(n->∞) 1-1/n= lim(n->0⁺) 1-n= lim 0.999...=1
         B= lim(n->∞) 1+1/n= lim(n->0⁺) 1+n= lim 1.000..?=1
 
What do you mean by that question mark?  Do you agree that both limits
in your example (A and B) are equal to 1?
 

Agree.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
26 Mar 24 * Repeating decimals are irrational35wij
26 Mar 24 +* Re: Repeating decimals are irrational24Keith Thompson
26 Mar 24 i`* Re: Repeating decimals are irrational23wij
26 Mar 24 i `* Re: Repeating decimals are irrational22Keith Thompson
26 Mar 24 i  `* Re: Repeating decimals are irrational21wij
26 Mar 24 i   `* Re: Repeating decimals are irrational20Keith Thompson
26 Mar 24 i    +- Re: Repeating decimals are irrational PLO1olcott
26 Mar 24 i    `* Re: Repeating decimals are irrational18wij
27 Mar 24 i     `* Re: Repeating decimals are irrational17Keith Thompson
27 Mar 24 i      `* Re: Repeating decimals are irrational16wij
27 Mar 24 i       `* Re: Repeating decimals are irrational15Keith Thompson
27 Mar 24 i        `* Re: Repeating decimals are irrational14wij
27 Mar 24 i         `* Re: Repeating decimals are irrational13Keith Thompson
27 Mar 24 i          `* Re: Repeating decimals are irrational12wij
27 Mar 24 i           `* Re: Repeating decimals are irrational11Keith Thompson
27 Mar 24 i            `* Re: Repeating decimals are irrational10wij
27 Mar 24 i             `* Re: Repeating decimals are irrational9Keith Thompson
27 Mar 24 i              `* Re: Repeating decimals are irrational8wij
27 Mar 24 i               `* Re: Repeating decimals are irrational7Keith Thompson
27 Mar 24 i                `* Re: Repeating decimals are irrational6wij
27 Mar 24 i                 +* Re: Repeating decimals are irrational3Keith Thompson
27 Mar 24 i                 i`* Re: Repeating decimals are irrational2wij
27 Mar 24 i                 i `- Re: Repeating decimals are irrational1Keith Thompson
27 Mar 24 i                 `* Re: Repeating decimals are irrational --agree--2olcott
27 Mar 24 i                  `- Re: Repeating decimals are irrational --agree--1wij
27 Mar 24 `* Re: Repeating decimals are irrational10Richard Damon
27 Mar 24  +- Re: Repeating decimals are irrational1wij
28 Mar 24  `* Re: Repeating decimals are irrational8wij
28 Mar 24   `* Re: Repeating decimals are irrational7Richard Damon
28 Mar 24    `* Re: Repeating decimals are irrational6wij
28 Mar 24     `* Re: Repeating decimals are irrational5Richard Damon
28 Mar 24      `* Re: Repeating decimals are irrational4wij
28 Mar 24       `* Re: Repeating decimals are irrational3Richard Damon
28 Mar 24        `* Re: Repeating decimals are irrational2wij
28 Mar 24         `- Re: Repeating decimals are irrational1Richard Damon

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal