Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH

On 2/13/25 7:07 PM, olcott wrote:

On 2/13/2025 3:20 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-02-13 04:21:34 +0000, olcott said:
>

On 2/12/2025 4:04 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-02-11 14:41:38 +0000, olcott said:
>

Of course not. However, the fact that no reference to that article
before or when HHH

>
That paper and its code are the only thing that I have been talking about in this forum for several years.

>
Doesn't matter when you don't say that you are talking about that paper.
>
Anyway, that is irrelevant to the fact that the subject line contains
a false claim.

>
It is a truism and not one person on the face of the
Earth can possibly show otherwise.

>
The fact that the claim on subject line is false is not a truism.
In order to determine the claim is false one needs some knowledge
that is not obvious.
>

 When you try to show the steps attempting to show that
it is false I will point out the error.

We havm, but you are too stupid to understand it.
Since when DD run, it halts, as you have agreed, BY DEFINITION, that input has haltiong behavior.
Remember, the question put to a halt decider is about the behavior the input represents, and the behavior of the input represents is defined to be the behavior of running the program it represents.

 This is the only topic that I will discuss and any
reply not showing all of the steps of a rebuttal
will be ignored.

THen why you keep on bringing up the STRAWMAN of the behavior of the incorrect simulation of the input by HHH?

 Even the stupidest bot that ever existed (Eliza)
can be a mere naysayer.
 

Yes, but you show her up at showing stupidity