Sujet : Re: Definition of real number ℝ --infinitesimal--
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 03. Apr 2024, 19:59:26
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <uuk5du$2mao$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/3/2024 12:23 PM, Keith Thompson wrote:
"Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> writes:
[...]
Olcott is unable to understand what it says in the context of the
real number system, even when spelled out to him in great
detail. Therefore he sticks to his own (wrong) interpretation and then
starts to fight it. Fighting windmills.
Might I suggest waiting to reply to olcott until he says something
*new*. It could save a lot of time and effort.
0.999... everyone knows that this means infinitely repeating digits
that never reach 1.0 and lies about it. I am not going to start lying about it.
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
…