Sujet : Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? ---
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 02. May 2024, 06:24:39
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v0v4i7$3l29l$13@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/1/2024 7:28 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 5/1/24 11:51 AM, olcott wrote:
Every D simulated by H that cannot possibly stop running unless
aborted by H does specify non-terminating behavior to H. When
H aborts this simulation that does not count as D halting.
Which is just meaningless gobbledygook by your definitions.
It means that
int H(ptr m, ptr d) {
return 0;
}
Your H is not simulating D at all thus not
"Every D simulated by H" quoted above
Your H is not simulating D at all thus not
"Every D simulated by H" quoted above
Your H is not simulating D at all thus not
"Every D simulated by H" quoted above
is always correct, because THAT H can not possible simulate the input to the end before it aborts it, and that H is all that that H can be, or it isn't THAT H. ---
Unless you clarify your altered definitions, H is what H is and that just becomes the conclusion.
>
Then you can compare the definitions and try
to determine whether "abnormal termination" implies halting or non-halting
or neither. Note that "halting" is a freature of a Turing machine (a Turing
machine halts or does not halt) but "abnormal termination" seems to be
a feature of a particlar simulation (a simulation of a Truing machine
is or is not abnormally terminated).
>
>
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer