Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts?

When the head line has the words "these verified facts" the message should
first tell what facts are "these verified facts" and who verified them
before any further discussion.
What Professor Sipser has verfied below is not a fact but a criterion.
On 2024-06-22 14:31:45 +0000, olcott said:

https://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Theory-Computation-Michael-Sipser/dp/113318779X/   To understand this analysis requires a sufficient knowledge of
the C programming language and what an x86 emulator does. HHH0
and HHH1 have this criteria as their algorithm:
 <MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022>
   If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its input D
   until H correctly determines that its simulated D would never
   stop running unless aborted then
    H can abort its simulation of D and correctly report that D
   specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations.
</MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022>

  ...
--
Mikko