Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c theory |
On 7/1/2024 10:02 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:Which shows that both simulations are incorrect. The aborted one and the crashed one.Op 01.jul.2024 om 16:35 schreef olcott:Of every possibility that can possibly be is is absolutelyOn 7/1/2024 9:27 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:>Op 01.jul.2024 om 14:57 schreef olcott:>On 7/1/2024 3:27 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:>Op 30.jun.2024 om 19:25 schreef olcott:>On 6/30/2024 3:42 AM, joes wrote:>
>No, I mean: why does the inner simulator repeat instead of aborting,>
the same as the outer one does?
>Technically it is called detecting a repeating state.Yeah, I know. My point is: all recursive calls both enter and detect
a repeating state.
>
The inner ones always see one less execution trace
than the next outer one, thus could only meet their
abort criteria after they have already been aborted.
>
Which indicates that they were aborted too soon, showing that the emulation was incorrect.
Unless the outer HHH aborts its simulation after some
fixed number of correct emulations or none of the HHH
ever aborts and HHH never stops running.
But that does not make the result of the abort correct.
>Not aborting will loop infinitely.>
If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its input D
until H correctly determines that its simulated D would never
stop running unless aborted
>
THEN H IS NECESSARILY CORRECT TO ABORT
THEN H IS NECESSARILY CORRECT TO ABORT
THEN H IS NECESSARILY CORRECT TO ABORT
It is inevitable to abort, but that does not make the simulation correct, because:
>
not inevitable to abort.
DDD correctly emulated by HHH is either aborted at some point
or crashes due to out-of-memory error.
You just aren't very good at these things are you?Even here your opinion is incorrect.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.