Re: Olcott seems to be willfully ignorant --- AKA is Fred a Liar ?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c theory 
Sujet : Re: Olcott seems to be willfully ignorant --- AKA is Fred a Liar ?
De : acm (at) *nospam* muc.de (Alan Mackenzie)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 03. Jul 2024, 17:18:02
Autres entêtes
Organisation : muc.de e.V.
Message-ID : <v63tjq$23vu$1@news.muc.de>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : tin/2.6.3-20231224 ("Banff") (FreeBSD/14.0-RELEASE-p5 (amd64))
olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/3/2024 11:04 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 03.jul.2024 om 17:51 schreef olcott:
On 7/3/2024 10:40 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

[ .... ]

_DDD()
[00002172] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
[00002173] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
[00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
[0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
[0000217f] 83c404     add esp,+04
[00002182] 5d         pop ebp
[00002183] c3         ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]

*This is the repeating state*

But not an *infinitely* repeating state.

The criteria that I spent two years writing and the best selling
author of theory of computation textbooks agrees with says nothing
about *infinitely* repeating state.

Irrelevant, because that is about a correct simulation. Your simulation
is incorrect, so Sipser does not apply here.

OK you are a liar then.

I don't think so.  There is only one liar on this newsgroup, and it's not
Fred.

--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).


Date Sujet#  Auteur
7 Jul 25 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal