Sujet : Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 10. Jul 2024, 13:37:21
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v6lva1$1tj30$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 7/10/2024 2:13 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 09.jul.2024 om 23:18 schreef olcot
_DDD()
[00002163] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping
[00002164] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping
[00002166] 6863210000 push 00002163 ; push DDD
[0000216b] e853f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DDD)
DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that
correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD can't make it
past the above line of code no matter what.
[00002170] 83c404 add esp,+04
[00002173] 5d pop ebp
[00002174] c3 ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [00002174]
Which proves that HHH does not interpret x86 code correctly.
*It interprets the code correctly*
https://github.com/wfeldt/libx86emuYour understanding of correctly incorrectly diverges
from the semantics of the x86 language making you wrong.
You responded to the wrong version of my post.
So, the set of HHH that correctly emulates is empty.
This is only your ignorance.
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
…