Sujet : Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters -- Professor Hehner
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 15. Jul 2024, 14:07:47
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v736v3$mjis$10@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 7/15/2024 2:25 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-07-14 15:02:33 +0000, olcott said:
Going to the assembly language level provides a directed
graph of control flow.
So does the C level.
A directed graph only uses jmps from one specific
machine address to another. This a node and a path
to another node. The C level has no jmps and no
machine addresses.
It also shows the final state that
is not shown at the C level.
How is that different from the final state that is shown at the C level?
void DDD()
{
HHH(DDD);
}
The C level conflates all of these instructions together
as if there was only one instruction. There is no final
state at C level.
_DDD()
[00002163] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping
[00002164] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping
[00002166] 6863210000 push 00002163 ; push DDD
[0000216b] e853f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DDD)
[00002170] 83c404 add esp,+04
[00002173] 5d pop ebp
[00002174] c3 ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [00002174]
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer