Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c theory 
Sujet : Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 01. Aug 2024, 14:04:23
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v8g14o$25l0a$9@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 8/1/2024 7:56 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 01.aug.2024 om 13:51 schreef olcott:
On 8/1/2024 2:46 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 01.aug.2024 om 05:51 schreef olcott:
On 7/31/2024 10:08 PM, wij wrote:
On Tue, 2024-07-30 at 18:50 -0500, olcott wrote:
>
It is not supposed to be a general solution to the halting problem.
it only shows how the "impossible" input is correctly determined
to be non halting.
>
>
But how do you determine it is non-halting?
>
As I know you are even unable to define what 'halt' mean !!!
>
I have done this thousands of times and after someone
has read these thousands of times they say that I never
said it once.
>
void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
   return;
}
>
int main()
{
   HHH(DDD);
}
>
If DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly
reach its return instruction then it never halts.
>
>
>
But a correct simulation is impossible.
>
When HHH does what-ever-the-hell the x86 semantics specifies
then HHH is correct.
>
 But since HHH deviates from the semantics of the x86 language (by skipping instructions of a halting  program) it is incorrect.
 
Only a freaking moron would believe that a non
terminating input should be simulated forever.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Date Sujet#  Auteur
6 Jul 25 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal