Re: You still seem too dishonest to admit that DDD correctly emulated by any HHH cannot possibly reach its own ,"return" instruction

On 8/4/24 10:49 PM, olcott wrote:

On 8/4/2024 9:18 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 8/4/24 9:07 PM, olcott wrote:>>

void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
   return;
}
>
You still seem too dishonest to admit that DDD correctly
emulated by any HHH cannot possibly reach its own "return"
instruction.

>
No, I admit that *IF* HHH does correctly (and thus completely without aborting) emulated its input, then THAT DDD and ONLY that DDD will be non-halting.
>

>
See there?
>
DDD correctly emulated by any HHH that can possibly exist
cannot possibly reach its "return" instruction and every
C expert knows this.

 But that only apply to the PROGRAM DDD built from an HHH that never aborts.