Sujet : Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?
De : mikko.levanto (at) *nospam* iki.fi (Mikko)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 07. Aug 2024, 08:24:44
Autres entêtes
Organisation : -
Message-ID : <v8v7fs$29ovd$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Unison/2.2
On 2024-08-05 15:01:36 +0000, olcott said:
On 8/5/2024 2:49 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-08-04 12:37:49 +0000, olcott said:
On 8/4/2024 2:18 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-08-03 13:58:07 +0000, olcott said:
On 8/3/2024 3:19 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-08-02 20:57:26 +0000, olcott said:
Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated
by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?
void DDD()
{
HHH(DDD);
return;
}
Everyone here understands that that depends on whther HHH returns.
Fred's understanding is worse than that.
You don't know whether that is true.
Some have deeper understanding than that.
*Ben has the best understanding of all*
In particular better than you.
*Ben has a deeper agreement with me than anyone else*
Doesn't matter. Points of disagreement, both deep and shallow, are
more important than points of agreement.
Not at all.
Most of the reviewers simply don't have a clue that they
don't have a clue. The error is entirely on their side.
Your reviewers don't need a clue. You need. But you don't have.
And you don't know you don't have so you don't seek. As you
don't seek you will never get.
-- Mikko
…