On 8/28/2024 11:23 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 28.aug.2024 om 17:18 schreef olcott:
On 8/28/2024 10:14 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 28.aug.2024 om 16:53 schreef olcott:
On 8/28/2024 9:38 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 28.aug.2024 om 14:46 schreef olcott:
On 8/28/2024 7:34 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 28.aug.2024 om 14:07 schreef olcott:
On 8/28/2024 4:00 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 27.aug.2024 om 15:32 schreef olcott:
>
<MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022>
If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its input D
until H correctly determines that its simulated D *would never*
*stop running unless aborted* then
<MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022>
>
HHH is only required to correctly predict whether or not DDD
*would never stop running unless aborted*
And since DDD is calling an HHH that is programmed to detect the 'special condition', so that it aborts and halts, DDD halts as well and
>
*THIS IS YOUR REASONING*
If you are hungry and never eat you will remain hungry.
You are hungry and eat becoming no longer hungry.
*This proves that you never needed to eat*
>
No, apparently, your understanding of logic English is very poor.
>
HHH simulates DDD until it has inductive evidence that
in the purely hypothetical case where a different HHH
would never abort its emulation of DDD that DDD would
never terminate normally.
>
Apparently you still do not understand that HHH should process its input, not your dreams of a pure hypothetical non-input.
>
>
void Infinite_Loop()
{
HERE: goto HERE;
return;
}
>
In other words you are saying that HHH must report that
infinite loops halt even though halting is reaching a
final halt state and infinite loops cannot possibly reach
a final halt state.
>
Your replies have stepped over the line of an honest dialogue.
>
>
No, you are dishonest by putting words in my mouth that I did not say.
>
I said HHH should report that a *halting* program halt.
You make it that I said that HHH must report that *infinite loops* halt.
>
HHH must report on what the behavior of its input
WOULD BE if it never aborted it emulation.
No, that is your error.
Read the specs a few more hundred times until
you notice exactly what the words actually say.
<MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022>
If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its input D
until H correctly determines that its simulated D
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
*would never stop running unless aborted*
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer